We could blame the Five Dicks (white Catholic Supreme Court members who move in tandem)...
...or you could blame the Supreme Dick (member in charge):
Why? Because of this from Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder:
There is no valid reason to insulate the coverage formula [used to determine which states and political subdivisions are subject to preclearance before passing laws affecting minority voting rights] from review merely because it was previously enacted 40 years ago. If Congress had started from scratch in 2006 [the last year it reauthorized the law unanimously], it plainly could not have enacted the present coverage formula. It would have been irrational for Congress to distinguish between States in such a fundamental way based on 40-year-old data, when today’s statistics tell an entirely different story. And it would have been irrational to base coverage on the use of voting tests 40 years ago, when such tests have been illegal since that time. But that is exactly what Congress has done.
...
Our country has changed, and while any racial discrimination in voting is too much, Congress must ensure that the legislation it passes to remedy that problem speaks to current conditions.Thus Chief Justice John Roberts spoke.
Yes, times have changed so much. This much:
Times Square, New York City, 2014, after the Michael Brown decision. |
Selma, Alabama, 1965, the year the Voting Rights Act passed. |
No comments:
Post a Comment